-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 264
[CustomOP][Refactor] Register CustomOP instead of overwrite forward_oot #1647
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
d5899fd
to
ddf940f
Compare
75dc907
to
f688f36
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (98.52%) is below the target coverage (100.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1647 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 27.39% 55.96% +28.56%
===========================================
Files 56 85 +29
Lines 6191 10203 +4012
===========================================
+ Hits 1696 5710 +4014
+ Misses 4495 4493 -2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request. |
This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request. |
This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request. |
* fix rope ut * add layernorm ut * add ut for common fused moe * update test Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
What this PR does / why we need it?
Register CustomOP instead of overwrite
forward_oot
.Next step:
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
N/A
How was this patch tested?